Argentine racquet wielder, Nicolas Arreche, received a four-year suspension from competitive play due to his participation in match manipulation.
The Tennis Integrity Unit (TIU) determined Arreche violated the sport’s anti-corruption regulations by influencing the results of contests between 2017 and 2019. Arreche, whose highest career position reached 567, was also deemed culpable for neglecting to disclose these actions to the TIU. He incurred an $8,000 penalty.
The inquiry uncovered that Arreche colluded to rig the outcomes of numerous tennis matches for wagering gains. Legal expert in athletics, Professor Richard McLaren, oversaw the proceedings and imposed the four-year prohibition, barring Arreche from competing in or being present at any tennis function authorized by regulatory bodies. The suspension is in effect from April 24, 2021, the date of Arreche’s initial temporary suspension, until April 23, 2025.
This judgment signifies the second instance recently where the TIU has addressed a similar offense. Mexican tennis athlete, Mauricio Astorga, was similarly determined to be complicit in match-fixing, resulting in a three-year ban and a $1,500 financial sanction.
These situations underscore the continuous battle against match manipulation within tennis, a persistent issue that continues to trouble the sport.
From 2018 to 2020, a quintet of tennis athletes were handed suspensions due to their participation in manipulating match outcomes. This mirrored a prominent 2008 incident involving Nikolay Davydenko, who ascended to a career pinnacle of third in global rankings, and effectively refuted comparable allegations.
Lingering doubts about extensive match manipulation continue to trouble the sport. Following the 2016 Wimbledon Championships, wagering trends hinted at the involvement of structured criminal groups, notably from Italy and Russia, in the competition. This prompted a comprehensive inquiry encompassing an astounding 26,000 matches.